AOL Gets In On The Populist Outrage Over Middle Class Tax Increases That Don’t Exist

I was very surprised to see this box front and center on AOL's homepage a couple of hours ago:

Aol first page

I was struck by the sub-headline, "Middle Class Is About to Feel the Pain."  I'm not aware of any planned increases to the middle class tax brackets, so I was interested to see how other changes to the tax code will be adversely affecting the middle class.

Clicking on the headline led to this box:

Aol second page

This Middle Class Model, apparently living in a dystopian 2011, looks very upset about the tax pain he's feeling.  Let's go to the gallery…

Aol third page 

And now we get a full view of our pinched model and an actual explanation of how the "Middle Class Is About to Feel the Pain."

Think Taxes Are Too High Now?  Just wait:  Congress is all but certain to raise them a couple of years from now.  Tax increases will hit both businesses and individuals – and not just singles making more than $200,000 a year and married couples over $250,000 a year.  They’ll be the first to get pinched, but not the last.  There’s just not enough revenue that can be drawn from the wealthy without crippling the economy, so in time, middle incomers will feel a bigger bite, too.

So the headline on the homepage reports Big Tax Hikes, saying the Middle Class Is About to Feel the Pain.  It takes two clicks in to find out that this is based on sheer speculation.  A theoretical prediction about the future of the economy and what the government will do about it.  The tax increases are "all but certain," which means of course: "nothing but uncertain."

I guess getting people scared and angry about imminent tax hikes boosts the click-through rate, even if those hikes are non-existent.  This is what we're replacing newspapers with.

I don’t understand the “flying spagetti monster” reference, but this is great.

From Salon's Letters section, in response to the latest God-Man installment.  Clockwork Smurf (?) says:

I don't think God Man has ever been depicted as specifically Christian (the old testiment refernce aside) but more a symbol of the notion of condenseing the devine into human terms, and of human interpretations of events.

I don't think he's even meant to specifically serve as a "flying spagetti monster" lampooning the idea of divinity, but more a lampooning of man's desire to fit divinity into a small prescribed cosmic place.

Of course, that's just my opinion on the subject.

UPDATE:  Thanks to alert readers, I now understand the Flying Spaghetti Monster reference.

Weird ’70s Pop Lyrics – “Clair”

It’s time for another installment of  WEIRD ‘70s POP LYRICS!  This week: “Clair.”


“Clair” was a 1972 hit for Gilbert O’Sullivan, the pseudonym for London-based singer/songwriter Raymond O’Sullivan, climbing to the #2 Pop Single on the Billboard chart.


Listening to this as a kid, nothing seemed amiss because although I must have heard this song dozens of times, I never paid attention to the lyrics in the least.  If you’d asked me what it was about, I would have remembered the only lyrics that stuck with me, the opening lines “Clair, the moment I met you, I swear,” and said that it’s some cheesy song about some guy who likes this girl named Clair.


When I heard it recently and actually listened to what this guy is singing about my jaw dropped.


Yes, this is it, folks.  The weirdest of all the weird ‘70s hits.  And get your pitchforks and torches ready because this one is so weird, you’ll suspect it’s criminal.  Or at least evidence of criminal, deeply immoral activity.  Seriously.  It’s hard to look at these lyrics and not wonder why Scotland Yard didn’t pay Mr. O’Sullivan a visit.


Okay, here we go.


As I said, the lyrics open up innocuously enough.  After some carefree whistling:


Clair, the moment I met you I swear,
I felt as if something somewhere,
Had happened to me,
Which I couldn't see

And then,
The moment I met you again,
I knew in my heart that we were friends,
It had to be so,
It couldn't be no


Like a million songs, this one’s about love at first sight.  What could go wrong from here?


But try as hard as I might do I don't know why,
You get to me in a way I can't describe,
Words mean so little when you look up and smile,
I don't care what people say,
To me you're more than a child,
Oh! Clair, Clair

Clair, if ever a moment so rare,
Was captured for all to compare,
That moment is you,
It's all that you do


“To me you’re more than a child.”  Okay, so it’s about a guy who’s in love with someone younger than he is.  That’s an issue for a lot of couples, no problem.  And clearly he doesn’t literally mean “child” (even though she has to look “up” to him to smile); he means a younger adult who O'Sullivan's wizened, jaded friends would dismiss as a child.  Right?


But why, in spite of our age difference, do I cry?
Each time I leave you I feel I could die


So the age difference is an issue, but it’s sweet — he can’t stand to be without her.


Nothing means more to me than hearing you say,
“I'm going to marry you,
Will you marry me, Uncle Ray?”
Oh! Clair, Clair


“Uncle?”  Wait a minute.  “Uncle Ray?!”  Is this really about a romance between Ray (O’Sullivan) and someone young enough, and familially close enough, to call him “Uncle?” 


Let’s back up.  Maybe it’s not about a romantic relationship.  He did say that when he met her, he knew they’d be “friends.”  And yet if he's just singing about an especially cute little girl who's his little pal, the lyrics are awfully overwrought.  Each time he leaves her, he could die.  And “nothing means more” to him than hearing her talk about marrying him.  And if they were just friends, why would he not “care what people say,” insisting she’s “more than a child”?


Um, just how young is she?  And how exactly do they know each other?  The answers:


Clair, I've told you before,
Don't you dare,
Get back into bed,
Can't you see that it's late


What?!  


No you can't have a drink,
Oh, all right then but wait just a bit,
While I, in an effort to baby sit,
Catch of my breath what there is left of it.


He’s babysitting her?!  


You can be murder at this hour of the day,
But in the morning this hour,
Will seem a lifetime away,
Oh! Clair, Clair 

Oh, Clair.


And the song ends with the sound of a little girl, perhaps five, giggling.

Fox News getting even more desperate

Media Matters caught Fox News deliberately quoting Obama grossly out of context.  In fact, that's an understatement… they deliberately misuse a video clip of Obama to totally and unabashedly misrepresent the policy he advocates.

In a video clip played several times by Fox News, to show how extreme Obama is on the issue of health care, they show him asking, "Now, the question is, if you're going to fix it, why not do a universal health care system like the European countries?"

The thing is: at the time, Obama was LITERALLY READING A QUESTION FROM THE AUDIENCE off a computer screen.  If you watch the full video, he then goes on to say that while his goal is universal health care, he does not necessarily support a European-style solution, and would prefer building it onto our current system.

I can't imagine a benign explanation for this.

Via Daily Kos…

object width="448" height="368">http://www.dailykostv.com/flv/player.swf

From the Tom the Dancing Bug Facebook Page:

Last night, I helped my daughter study for her test on Ancient Rome, and I learned two things. (1) Kids today get all high-and-mighty when you suggest writing a few answers on their forearms. I mean, excuse me for taking a few shortcuts when I was a kid so that I could grow up successful and provide for you. And (2) an army must grow or die. And so even though we have shattered the 100 Fan barrier in record time, we must continue to expand! What loftier goal is there than pointless self-aggrandizement? And so, I announce the new goal of 500 Fans! And the celebrity I will race against toward this finish line? 19th century naturalist Charles Darwin!

Become a Fan of Tom the Dancing Bug, and help put this foppish botanist in his place.

Nate the Neoconservative is getting in line

000Kristolpic

Yesterday, Bill Kristol, the conservative pundit who has set a record for most consecutive things uttered that have been proven to be false (1,459,345 and counting) was awarded a $250,000 Bradley Prize.

"Through the Bradley Prizes, we recognize individuals like William Kristol who have made outstanding contributions, in hopes that others will strive for excellence in their respective fields," Michael W. Grebe, president and chief executive officer of the Bradley Foundation, said.

Well, you've encouraged me to strive for the kind of excellence that Kristol achieved.  That is, being outrageously, consistently and disastrously wrong.  So:

I'm certain that if the United States invades Narnia, we'll be greeted as liberators.
There is no doubt that my next door neighbor is developing and/or harboring nuclear weapons.
By this day next month, former major league outfielder Omar Moreno will be regarded as America's finest President ever.
The Egg McMuffin ™ coddles terrorists.

I've got tons more, but that should be enough for at least ten grand.  CHECK FOR TEN GRAND, PLEASE!