MONKEY BUSINESS, PART 1

000PROJECT-NIM-003-400

 

I recently saw the movie Project Nim, a very sad but fascinating documentary about a chimp who was the subject of an experiment into whether, if raised in a human family using sign language, the chimp would learn language the way a human baby does.  After living its childhood with a human family in a brownstone on the Upper West Side, then in a mansion in the Bronx with language educators, the lead scientist ended the experiment, and Nim was a talking chimp who had lived its life with loving human caretakers/famaily who had nowhere to go.  He was taken to various caged chimpanzee facilities, and at one point ended up at a pharmaceutical animal testing laboratory run by NYU.

 

000ProjectNimPoster

 

Watching this, I was actually jealous of the ingenuity of this concept as a piece of fictional satire: you couldn't devise a more perfect thought-experiment to highlight the hypocricies of animal testing.  We believe that testing on animals for the benefit of humans is moral, but what if one of the animals was not only our closest relative, the chimpanzee, but one who had been taught to speak?

 

 

And then I realized, from the dim memory of my earliest days as a cartoonist, why I felt a strong connection to this concept:  I had devised a version of that very satire!  I had wondered how far we would take animal testing, and how far away from our evolutionary branch would we be willing to accept cruel treatment for the sake of our own marginal betterment.  So I used my character Charley the Australopithecine (an ancestral species to humans) in an animal-testing setting.  I even used a sign-language speaking chimp.  (I'm sure I had heard of Nim — and another chimp used in a similar experiment, Washoe — but that I was unaware of the sad and bizarrely ironic fate that had befallen Nim.

 

By the way, I think my favorite hero of the movie was the lawyer who devised a legal strategy to free Nim from the testing facility, and planned to have him TESTIFY in court to gain his freedom.  The very threat of this litigation was successful in getting Nim out of there (and into another facility with other challenges).

 

Anyway, I thought it would be fun to publish this four-part series, from the very beginnings of Tom the Dancing Bug.  I'll run one per day.

 

224TEMP1

 

To comment, please use facebook or twitter (#tomthedancingbug).

 

TOM THE DANCING BUG T-SHIRTS DISCOUNTAPALOOZA!!

With these two offers, you can't afford NOT to buy this (or any) Tom the Dancing Bug t-shirt!

 

Get Free Shipping when you sign up for a free trial Zazzle Black membership.  Click here for more info.

 

Get $5.00 OFF by entering Promotional Code SAYITTSHIRTS during checkout!  Offer valid through August 21.  Click here for more info.

 

Charley ad

 

To comment, please use facebook or twitter (#tomthedancingbug).

 

 

Bonus Tom the Dancing Bug

In response to reader request, and to honor of our current deficit "debate," I present a comic from last year, demonstrating Hollingsworth Hound's complicated realtionship with his Deficit Hawk.  He doesn't realize that that bird can fly in two directions.

 

1001temp

 

To comment, please use facebook or twitter (#tomthedancingbug).

Am I the only one left with integrity?

And then there's another nominee, Garry Trudeau (Doonesbury), trying to make up for a lack of quality, longevity and popularity by embarking on an embarrassing globe-trotting campaign for the Harvey Award, most recently giving an interview in Ireland in which he is so articulate, thoughtful and charming, one wonders how he looks at himself in the mirror.

 

To comment, please use facebook or twitter (#tomthedancingbug).

 

 

Sacred Pledges

Remember in the '90s when all those Republicans, acting on the Contract With America, got elected to Congress by pledging not to seek reelection after a certain number of terms, in support of their commitment to the concept of term limits?

 

Well, in 2004 and 2006, when it came time for many of these patriotic folks of integrity to step down according to their own solemn pledges, they suddenly decided that it's really, really important for them to keep their jobs and run for reelection.  Breaking those inconvenient pledges was a sacrifice they were willing to make so that their country could have the benefit of such wonderful people having great government jobs.

 

Many of those congresspeople signed the Americans for Tax Reform's "Taxpayer Protection Pledge," vowing at the time of election to their voters to oppose tax increases.  

 

So what is the position of these honorable lawmakers on breaking pledges, not to preserve their own jobs, but for the somewhat important purpose of preventing a United States default and potential national and international economic meltdown?

 

These are the congresspeople who BROKE their Pledge not to seek reelection (according to Open Congress), but are current signatories of the Pledge not to raise taxes:

 

 

Sen. Richard M. Burr (R-N.C.)

Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.)

Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio)

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Virginia)

Rep. Ralph Hall (R-Texas)

Rep. Steven C. LaTourette (R-Ohio)

Rep. Donald Manzullo (R-Ill.)

Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) – "(The movement to limit terms has) just petered out."

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) – She said that while she still supports term limits, she will not bind herself unless senators from other states also leave after two terms.

Rep. Timothy Johnson (R-Ill.) – "I underestimated the value of seniority."

Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-N.J.) – "Term limits for the 2nd District only could put us at a disadvantage."

Rep. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.) – "The pledge was a mistake."

 

To comment, please use facebook or twitter (#tomthedancingbug).

 

(edited to reflect that Barbara Cubin is no longer in Congress) 

(edited to reflect that Ralph Hall signed the pledge as a Democrat, but is now a Republican)

Thanks to those who wrote in with corrections.